Temporary Orders Hearing: Step 2 of the Divorce Proceeding

Before the TRO expires, a judge will schedule a temporary orders hearing to determine if the TRO needs to be made permanent while the divorce goes forward.  The temporary orders hearing will usually happen within two to four weeks after the divorce is filed.

Often temporary orders are arrived at by agreement of the parties through negotiations.  Occasionally, the agreements may be handled informally, without the entry of court orders.  This usually only works when the parties are very agreeable.

If there is no agreement, the court will approach the temporary orders hearing like a miniature trial, allowing the attorney and parties to call witnesses, present evidence, and prove their case for what should happen while the divorce is pending.  The judge will make provisions for temporary spousal support, temporary custody and possession arrangements, temporarychild support, temporary use of property and payment of debts, and payment of interim attorney's fees, if applicable.  These are the orders that will govern your daily life until the divorce is finalized.

Some counties use Associate Judges to handle temporary orders hearings.  The Associate Judge is appointed by the elected District Judge to sit in matters assigned to her.  Following a contested temporary orders hearing held in front of an Associate Judge, a party dissatisfied with the outcome has a very limited time to appeal the ruling.

Excerpted from my book, "Basics of Texas Divorce Law"

Prenup Bump -- Is Tiger Woods Changing Minds About Them?

Tiger Woods recent marital problem highlights the need for premarital agreements sometimes called prenuptial agreements.  There's been speculation that Tiger Woods and his wife may have reached an agreement to stay married and avoid divorce -- which in Texas is called a postnuptial agreement.  The gritty details of actor Dennis Hopper's and golf aces Tiger Woods' and Greg Norman's prenups have all been hot topics on the internet.

Suze Orman encourages every engaged couple to get one to protect their current and future assets as well as to sheild themselves in case a mate secretly runs up massive credit card debt. "People are hopeful," Orman says. "They want their relationship to last. ... It's just natural that they don't think they'll need a prenup. Never in a million years do they think (divorce) will happen." In 2008, the divorce rate was about 50%. Among married Americans, the median duration of their wedded life in 2008 was 18 years, according to Pew Research Center's analysis of government data. Given those odds, "Hope is not a financial plan," says Orman, who urges that every couple get a prenup. "The time to plan for a divorce is not when you're in a state of hate," she says.

Among the divorced, 15% say they regret not having a prenup in their most recent marriage, according to the Harris poll. Men are more likely than women to have this regret, at 19% vs. 12%. Nearly 40% of divorced Americans also say they would ask their significant other to sign a prenuptial agreement if they remarried.

Elizabeth Gilbert, the author of Eat Pray Love and Committed, advocates for couples to get prenups:  "Marriage is not just a private love story but also a social and economical contract of the strictest order," she says.  "If it weren't, there wouldn't be thousands of municipal, state and federal laws pertaining to our matrimonial union."

USA Today writer Laura Petrecca in the USA Today article Prenuptial agreements: Unromantic, but Important cites to a Harris Interactive study that nearly 2/3rds of singles say they would ask for a prenup.  On the other hand, of those polled, only 3% actually had prenups.

That statistic may mean that prenups are on the rise.  Or, it could mean that they chicken out of throwing cold water on the afterglow of the engagement. Let's face it: The afterglow of that Valentine's Day proposal often begins to dim as discussions of wedding details get started. The happy couples face potential buzz killers that are financial (how to keep reception costs down), logistical (where to seat relatives not on speaking terms) and, in recent years, even more controversial (So, honey, I love you, but how about that prenuptial agreement ...).

The prenup seems so utterly unromantic — or just plain wrong — but it's also become so right for so many these days: those keenly aware that a marriage may end up in a legal separation, divorce or death. Most prenups tackle financial issues such as real estate, division of bank accounts and potential spousal support in the case of divorce or separation.

Prenups can focus on the obvious disparity in earnings or wealth, credit card or student loan debts, future spousal support, or child support paid to children from another relationship.  But prenups can also address emotional or behavioral issues.  One example cited in the USA Today article references a husband who wanted to make sure his wife remained drug-free so he conditioned payment of spousal support upon a clean drug test each month.  Other prenups have addressed issues such as adultery, intimacy, weight-gain, division of household duties. Those clauses may seem unnecessary to some folks, but nailing down what is important to each individual — be it the ownership of a ski house, retaining the rights to an antique tea set or determining who keeps the pets after the breakup — is vital to do before the marriage laws kick in.

The bottom line is that a prenup can address whatever issues are important to the spouses -- from simple identification of assets and debts going into the marriage, to the more complex issues about how the marriage relationship will work.  There is really no "form" prenup -- it should contain the provisions that are important to the people signing it.  A prenup gives the soon-to-be-spouses a way to re-write the law that governs a divorce to conform to their own expectations.

Keep in mind, however, that even if  a prenup is executed, a party may still seek to challenge it.  Under Texas law a person may challenge a prenup based on the circumstances surrounding its signing -- was it signed under "duress"?  Or, it may be challenged based on the contents being so unfair as to be termed "unconscionable".  Parties to a prenup must make a full disclosure of income, assets, and debts.

More Tips for Avoiding Financial Disaster in Divorce

1. Negotiate a reasonable settlement.

Get some professional advice from a CDFA or CFP to make sure you'll be able to live with the financial terms of the settlement -- now and into the future. 1.Don't live beyond your income. Reduce your expenses -- or increase your income -- so that you are always saving something for a rainy day. Ask your financial advisor for help creating a budget if necessary.


2. Think twice about keeping the family home.

Ask your financial advisor whether you can truly afford it, and ask them to show you what cash you'd have available for investment if you moved to a smaller home.

3. Realize that you won't get everything you want in the property division.

Don't spend months and thousands of dollars fighting over furniture, appliances, or other personal items. Make a short list of "Must-Haves" and be prepared to compromise on everything else. Look at the big picture; is this asset best for your situation?

4. Protect your Retirement Assets.

In the U.S., have the QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order) filed as soon as possible. 

5. Use debt sparingly.

Get a copy of your credit report and close all joint accounts and all credit you do not use. Avoid maintaining balances on credit cards.

Credit Rating and Divorce

Divorce can be a trying time on your credit as well as your finances and emotions.  A vindictive or spendthrift ex-spouse can incur debt on your joint accounts and destroy your credit rating during hte divorce process.  I fyou are not able to pay a joint account in full, inquire as to whether you can maintain a balance on the account after it is closed to prevent the situation from gettng worse. 

Tips for dealing with your credit during a divorce:

  • Get a copy of your credit report and familiarize yourself with everything in it.
  • Close all accounts that you do not need or use.
  • If you don't already have one, apply for a credit card in your name while you can.
  • Close all joint accounts and credit cards as soon as possible.

Keep in mind that many of the courts in Texas have orders that prohibit accounts from being closed or limited while the divorce is pending.  So, either take these actions before the divorce is filed or you may need to seek court approval to do so. For example, see the Collin County Standing Order that applies to all pending divorces and my prior post on this topic: Collin County Texas Divorce Standing Order

Your credit report shoudl help you discover any outstanding debts that need to be addressed as part of the divorce process.  Consider using marital assets or funds to pay off joint debts so each spouse can start over with a clean slate.

Once the divorce is finalized, use credit cards sparingly.  To establish or maintain a good credit score, pay off balances on time every month. 

If you need to use credit for short-term liquidity, then you may be better off refinancing your home and avoiding balances on credit cards.  Benfits of home financing include deductibility of the mortgage interest and a lower interest rate.

 

Alimony in Texas?!? [Part 2 of 2]

In my previous post about spousal maintenance I discussed eligibility requirements.  In this post, I'll address the various methods of collecting and enforcing spousal maintenance awards.

If the court grants an award for spousal maintenance, the judgment dissolving the marriage must reflect this.  The spousal support order should state who will receive the payments and who will make the payments.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.001(3)(4).  The order must state how the spousal maintenance payments are to be made (i.e., by cash, check, and how frequently) and where they are to be sent.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.052.  Finally, the spousal maintenance order must state the duration of the maintenance.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.052. 

To aid in the collection of spousal maintenance, the court has discretion to order wage withholding (withholding automatically occurs for child support).  Wage withholding can be accomplished through (1) a wage withholding order; (2) a voluntary writ of withholding; or (3) a writ of withholding.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.101(a) & 8.251(a).  

For court ordered wage withholding, the wage withholding order must contain the style and cause number of the dissolution suit; the obligor and obligee's names; the amount and duration of the spousal maintenance payments; a directive to the obligor's employer to withhold from the obligor's disposable earnings; a requirement that the obligor notify the court of any change in address or employer.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.152(a) & (b).

A writ of withholding is used if when the court ordered spousal maintenance it did not issue a withholding order.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.251(a).  A writ of withholding is different from a withholding order because it must be issued by the court clerk, not the judge.  In order to obtain a writ of withholding, there are three steps:  (1) the obligee must file notice of application for applying for the writ with the court; (2) the obligee must provide this notice to the obligor; and (3) upon the obligor's receipt of the notice, the obligor can either choose whether or not to challenge the notice.  The notice of a writ of withholding must contain: (1) the amount of monthly maintenance due; (2) that the order applied to each current or future employer or period of employment for the duration of the order; (3) that the obligor's employer will be notified to begin the withholding if the obligor does not contest the notice within ten days of receiving it; (4) the procedures for contesting the notice of application; (5)  that the only grounds for successfully contesting a writ of withholding are a dispute about the obligor's identity or about the existence or amount of any arrearages; and (6) that if the obligor contests the withholding, the obligor will be given an opportunity for a hearing within 30 days after the notice is received.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.252. 

Finally, an obligor can request a voluntary writ of withholding even though a withholding order or writ of withholding has not been served on any party.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.108(a).  The request must be signed by both the obligor and obligee and be notarized.  Id.  Once the request has been filed, the clerk must deliver a writ of withholding to the obligor's employer.  Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 8.108(b).

Sounds confusing?  Well, unfortunately it is.  The good news is by taking the first step and trying to learn about spousal maintenance in Texas you have a leg up on your opponent.  The next step is to hire a Dallas divorce attorney who is compassionate and relentless about your case from beginning to end.

 

 

You look so nice, but can you be mean?

I recently came across a blog written by an Alabama divorce attorney that covers one of the questions our firm is asked a lot:  You look so nice, but can you be "mean"?  Typically people come into our office looking not only for a way to move on with their lives, but also for some sort of revenge.  The style of your lawyer will greatly influence to what extent this is possible and appropriate.

Divorce lawyers generally fit into one of three categories: (1) the lamb; (2) the bulldog; and (3) the fox.  The lamb is the type of lawyer who takes a reactive instead of a proactive approach to case management.  The lamb avoids confrontation with his or her client and opposing counsel at all costs, and often at a disadvantage to the client.  In short, the lamb's laissez-faire mentality hinders client advancement and often results in an inequitable resolution of the case. 

Directly opposite the lamb is the bulldog.  The bulldog seeks out confrontation (often on frivolous issues) at all costs and is typically the first personality type that comes to mind when clients think of a "mean" lawyer.  Although the bulldog's aggression is no doubt appropriate in some instances, it also poses an obstacle in the road towards favorable resolution.  The bulldog's aggressive approach can end up costing the client both in terms of property and custody matters but also in unnecessary attorneys fees. 

Finally, we have the fox.  The fox sees the forest through the trees and is cunning enough to know when aggression is appropriate and when it is not.  Unlike the lamb, the fox is not afraid of confrontation; and unlike the bulldog, the fox knows that fair out of court settlement are always preferred to litigation.  The fox is assertive when appropriate and aware of the consequences of its actions. 

Do yourself a favor when searching for a divorce attorney and hire yourself a fox (our Dallas divorce firm has three of them). You'll be far better off in the long run than you would with a bulldog.