Temporary Orders Hearing: Step 2 of the Divorce Proceeding

Before the TRO expires, a judge will schedule a temporary orders hearing to determine if the TRO needs to be made permanent while the divorce goes forward.  The temporary orders hearing will usually happen within two to four weeks after the divorce is filed.

Often temporary orders are arrived at by agreement of the parties through negotiations.  Occasionally, the agreements may be handled informally, without the entry of court orders.  This usually only works when the parties are very agreeable.

If there is no agreement, the court will approach the temporary orders hearing like a miniature trial, allowing the attorney and parties to call witnesses, present evidence, and prove their case for what should happen while the divorce is pending.  The judge will make provisions for temporary spousal support, temporary custody and possession arrangements, temporarychild support, temporary use of property and payment of debts, and payment of interim attorney's fees, if applicable.  These are the orders that will govern your daily life until the divorce is finalized.

Some counties use Associate Judges to handle temporary orders hearings.  The Associate Judge is appointed by the elected District Judge to sit in matters assigned to her.  Following a contested temporary orders hearing held in front of an Associate Judge, a party dissatisfied with the outcome has a very limited time to appeal the ruling.

Excerpted from my book, "Basics of Texas Divorce Law"

Filing a Divorce Petition: What You Need to Know

There are five basic stages to a divorce proceeding.  Filing a divorce petition is the first.

Any Divorce, even one on friendly terms where everything is agreed, must begin with the filing of an "original petition for divorce" in a state district court.

Some counties in Texas, such as Dallas and Tarrant counties, have specialized courts that deal only with family law matter like divorce.  Most other counties send divorces through the same general district courts used for all types of civil and criminal matters.

In order to file for divorce in Texas, one of the spouses must have been a resident of the state for the six months prior to filing the petition and a resident of the county where the suit is filed for 90 days.

Most petition include a request for a two-week temporary restraining order (TRO).  This is intended to freeze things as they are and prevent one spouse from taking any action that harms the other.

The TRO prevents spouses from hiding money or spending money in abnormal ways.  It also prevents the interference of the use of the marital residence.  The TRO cannot exclude a party from the home without special circumstances, and it prevents the changing of locks or any other type of exclusionary action.  The TRO specifically excepts spending moneys for reasonable and necessary living expense, including attorneys' fees, or business expenses of the parties.

Some counties utilize a standard TRO, called the Standing Order, in every family law case, including divorces, to automatically and mutually prohibit both spouses from taking certain actions upon filing of the case.  The Standing Order is effective upon filing of the petition.  The enforceability of the Standing Order may be questionable, so some lawyers may elect to request a TRO in addition to the Standing Order.  Some counties that use the Standing Order include Bell, Blanco, Brazos, Burnet, Caldwell, Coke, Collin, Concho, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Grayson, HAys, Irion, Llano, McLennan, Montgomery, Nueces, Rockwall, Runnels, San Saba, Schleicher, Sterling, Tom Green, Travis, and Walker.  Each county's Standing Order may differ slightly. 

 

Excerpted from my book, "Basics of Texas Divorce Law"  

Taking Control

Excerpted from an article by Diana Shepherd, CDFA

Posted by Michelle May O’Neil on August 8, 2011

 

Do you have a written, detailed, up-to-date budget detailing all your daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly expenses and income? If you’re like most people, your answer to this question will be “no.” The lack of a budget may have caused financial problems during your marriage, but it could be ruinous post-divorce.

The first step to gaining control of your finances—and life—during divorce is to prepare an accurate current budget and a post-divorce budget. You will need to gather documentation to ensure that your budget is objective and not the product of guess-work.

Identify your sources of income, which includes revenue from full- and part-time employment, investment return, and self-employment income. Add up all the income from different sources to come up with total income. If you’re clueless about what your spouse earns, obtain or make copies of his/her tax returns for the last three to five years.

After you have an accurate picture of what’s coming in, you need to create an equally accurate picture of what’s going out. You should review your check register and credit-card statements—or your online banking records if that’s how you usually pay your bills. Remember that not all your expenses are paid monthly; some insurance premiums or tax bills might be payable quarterly or annually, so make sure to account for those as well.

Don’t forget about cash withdrawals using ATM cards; you’ll be surprised how quickly taking $50 here and $100 there can put you in the red if these withdrawals are not included in your budget. Also, you need to be able to account for where/how you spent the cash: was it taking taxis to work, going out to restaurants, on a new outfit, or paying the babysitter?

After you’ve completed a “first draft” of your budget, ask a reasonable and financially-savvy friend or family member to review it and question the expenses that seem unreasonable. If you’re going to ask for help with your budget, you’ll have to agree to keep an open mind and not to become angry or defensive if he/she questions one of your items. This person is trying to help you, and he/she will probably be a lot easier on you that a judge would be!

If you’re like most people, your number-one financial concern during divorce is maintaining positive cash flow—in other words, being able to pay the bills on a monthly basis—not only on the day after divorce, but five, ten, 15 years into the future. In order to meet cash-flow needs, there are three sources of money that may be available to you as a result of your divorce: child support, spousal support, and marital property. Let’s take a quick look at all three.

 

Child Support

In the US and Canada, a parent is obligated to support his or her children, regardless of the parent’s marital status. All states and provinces have child support guidelines; you should review the guidelines in your area to get a rough idea of what you might be entitled to receive or have to pay. Generally speaking, child support is based on factors such as the ages of and number of minor children, the amount of time they will reside with each parent, and the income of each parent. These factors are plugged into a formula, which then supplies a recommendation for the Court. In a divorce situation, the non-custodial parent is usually ordered to pay child support to the custodial parent, from which the custodial parent pays the child’s expenses.

However, the child support formula does not take into consideration your child’s actual expenses. For example, extra-curricular activities, private school tuition, and college funding are not factored into the formula. These are considered “extraordinary expenses,” and they are often an area of great discussion and/or argument. One of the ways in which a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst™ (CDFA™) can help their clients is to determine which costs may not be addressed by the guidelines and then to help them find alternative solutions to cover these expenses. Since child support is such a complex area of the law—and because it can be a very contentious issue between divorcing parents—you should ask your lawyer for guidance regarding the child support amount.

Spousal Support

Another source of income (or an expense) for many divorced people will be spousal support. Spousal support is based on different factors, and it’s a very gray and subjective area. However, the two most heavily weighted factors are need and ability to pay; the length of the marriage is another factor that is considered when awarding spousal support. Unless you have prepared an accurate budget, you will not know how much spousal support you need—or, if you’re on the other end of the equation, how much you can afford to pay.

Property

The third potential source of money in a divorce is property. Many states and provinces call for an equitable division of property. “Equitable” does not always mean “equal”—it is, however, supposed to mean “fair.” If the spouses can’t agree, the judge is the final arbiter of what constitutes fair. Although most divorces settle 50/50, it can make a huge difference which 50% you get; in other words, all assets are not created equal. The first thing to know is that there are two kinds of property: Marital and Separate. Anything that is marital will go into the marital pie that’s going to be equitably divided; anything that’s separate property will not. The distinction between the two is a gray area and should be discussed with your lawyer. To read more about the types of property, click here.

The Last Word

You need to create an accurate budget today, and you need to understand how child support, spousal support, and property division will impact your ability to cover your cash-flow needs. Remember, you only get one chance to negotiate your property settlement. Can you really afford to make a mistake?

Click the link to read the entire article and find our more about how a CDFA can help you take control of your finances during and post divorce.

Debt in Divorce

   An excerpt from my book, Basics of Texas Divorce Law on debt division in divorce:

     To determine liability for a debt as between spouses, there are two inquiries - which person may be liable and which assets may be liable.

     A debt incurred by a spouse during the marriage is presumed to be a community property debt.  A debt incurred before the marriage is presumed to be separate property debt.  If a debt is incurred during the marriage, but the creditor agreed to look solely to the separate property of the spouse for satisfaction of the debt, then the debt may be a separate property debt.  Characterization of the debt as in the nature of community property does not determine the question of liability.  The designation of a debt as community property has no effect on which spouse may actually be liable for the repayment of the debt.  The fact that spouses are married, does not, by itself, create liability by one spouse for the debts of the other spouse.  The mere fact of marriage does not create joint liability on all debts.  If one spouse incurs a debt as the agent for the other spouse, or if the debt is for basic living necessities, then both spouses may be help jointly liable, together with the jointly help community assets.

     To determine which spouse's properties may be liable, the marital property needs to be classified as to which spouse has the right to manage it - each spouse may have separate and community sole management property and there may be joint management property of both spouses.  A spouse's separate property is not generally subject to the other spouse's debt liability.  Further, each spouse has sole management and control over his or her community property that each would have owned except for being married, such as personal earnings.  This sole management community property may only be used to satisfy the debts of the spouse that manages the property or the joint debts.  Jointly managed property, such as a jointly titled asset, may be used to satisfy either spouses' community or separate liabilities.

     When looking at borrowed funds, the examination goes further into the intent of the spouses in incurring the debt.  If the money is borrowed to benefit a spouse's separate property, and the intent is to repay the funds using separate property, then the borrowed funds will likely be separate in nature.

     Most credit cards are opened with an account agreement.  From a contract law perspective, only the parties to the contract are bound to the terms of the agreement.  Therefore, it is simple to determine who is contractually liable if one has a copy of the account agreement - which hardly ever happens in practice.  If that is the case, the practitioner can utilize the credit report to determine if the spouse is contractually responsible, or just an authorized user.  Arguably, if a spouse is designated as an authorized user then that may create agency as defined above.  Alternately, if the purchases were for necessities, liability could be present regardless of whether one was an authorized user or not.

     Nevertheless, an authorized user should probably not seek to assume this unsecured liability in the decree.  If this is done, the authorized user will have a difficult time in restricting the future access of the other spouse to that account.  While an in junction may assist in protecting the authorized user, it would still be advisable to not seek responsibility for the payment of this debt.  Alternatively, the spouse who is the primary card holder should (as soon as legally possible) revoke the authorized user status of the ex-spouse to avoid problems.

     In determining the division of the overall estate, and debt in particular, it is important to determine which spouse and/ or assets may be liable for the debt and divide the debt according to liability.  Otherwise, if a debt is allocated in a divorce to a spouse who is not legally liable, then the spouse has little motivation to pay and there are few legal remedies available in the court system to force payment against a non-willing spouse.  Further, the credit of the spouse incurring the debt can be damaged by relying on the nonliable spouse to make payment.

     The division of debts between the spouses has no effect on the creditor's ability to collect the debt.  Even if one spouse is allocated the debt in the divorce, if the debt is one for which the other spouse is liable, the creditor can seek payment from the other spouse regardless of the wording of the divorce decree.  The only recourse that a spouse has in such a situation is to sue the spouse that was supposed to pay and seek reimbursement.

     One way to conclusively address debt and liability in a divorce is to allocate other assets to pay the community debts of each spouse, leaving fewer assets but no debts to divide.  When possible, the system allows both spouses to leave the marriage with a "clean slate."

How to Find the Best Lawyer for You

Not just any lawyer, the best lawyer.  It is certainly understandable that someone who suddenly needs a lawyer to end a marriage would want to find the best one around. It's not only part of our competitive nature, but it's also common sense.

When trying to find the best lawyer for you, wherever you are, here are some things to consider.

1. You need to define what makes a lawyer the best one for you. What are the most important qualities that you are looking for? Do you want a business-like personality or someone who is very personable and casual? Do you want a very structured attorney or a more laid back approach? Some lawyers are abrasive and others are instantly your best friend. You should get to know something about a lawyer’s personality and approach to practicing law.

2. Another stylistic option is whether you want a decision-maker or an option-developer. Some lawyers get the facts of the case and then start telling clients what to do. Other lawyers help clients develop a variety of options and then assist them in choosing a course of action. Some clients just want to turn over their legal matter to their attorney and let the attorney take care of it. How involved do you want to be?

3. What is the financial range of fees you are comfortable with? Generally, the more experience or more demand there is for a lawyer, the higher the fees will be. More expensive lawyers aren't always the best, but they often are much better than inexpensive lawyers. If your case is very complicated or unusual, you may want to hire an experienced attorney, but make sure you can afford the attorney. Even among very good attorneys, there will be a range of fees that they charge.

4. Do you want or need a trial lawyer or a settlement specialist? Don't assume that you necessarily want to take your case to trial. Likewise, you shouldn't assume that your case will be settled. It is true that most family law cases settle, but some have to be tried. You should consider both approaches and find out how prospective lawyers view your case.

5. Sometimes, location can be a consideration. You generally want to hire a lawyer in your own county, or wherever the suit is located. But, you may or may not have to go to your attorney's office very often after the attorney is hired. Much of the contact between lawyers and clients takes place via email or by phone or fax. However, you probably should hire someone local who is familiar with the local courts, judges and courthouse personnel.

Hat tip to Dick Price for his April 15, 2011 post