Tips on how to keep costs down during a divorce.

Dallas divorce attorneys are frequently asked by their clients how they can keep the costs of a divorce down.  Here are several tips to keep in mind:

1.  Begin tracking down all of your financial documents.  In almost every divorce case your attorney will need to see copies of your bank and savings account information as well as your 401K statements.  Getting a head start by gathering up this information can save you the time (expense) of having your attorney track down these documents.  It is also important to remember to gather up complete documents, not simply the cover page or summary page of the statements.  Your attorney will need the complete statements in order to effectively present the information to the other side. 

2.  Start making a list of all the property that you own.  Again, in almost all divorce cases each party will have to complete a document called an inventory and appraisal which lists all the property and liabilities each party has.  Getting a head start on gathering the information which goes in the inventory and appraisal can cut back on the amount of time your attorney has to spend preparing the inventory and appraisal.

3.  Communicate with your soon to be former spouse.  If at all possible (i.e. if your divorce is relatively uncontested) a lot of attorney time can be saved by negotiating the terms of the division of the property with your soon to be ex.  Although this may not be possible in every case, if there is a open line of communication available, use it to your advantage! 

Hat tip to Dick Price's blog for the idea behind this post. 

 

 

The Inception of Title Rule - A Primer.

Frequently I receive a lot of questions regarding how to prove the character of a certain piece of property.  Recall that community property in Texas is defined in the negative as all property acquired during the marriage except through gift, devise or descent.  Thus, community property is pretty much every piece of property obtained during the marriage what wasn't gifted or inherited to one particular spouse.  Separate property is property that does not owe its existence to the marriage.  Put another way, everything that is not community property is defined as separate property, including property which was owned prior to the marriage. 

Under the Texas Family Code there is a statutory presumption that all property owned by either spouse during or upon dissolution of marriage is community property.  See Tex. Fam. Code Sect. 3.003(a).  Once it is established that property is in the possession of either spouse, there is a presumption that the property is community property and belongs to the community estate.  In order to over come this presumption, a spouse is required to show through clear and convincing evidence that the property is not community property. 

One of the ways spouses frequently show that property is not community property is to rely on the inception of title rule.  Under the inception of title rule, a property's character is based on the time and manner in which a person first acquires an interest in the property.  Generally, if a person first acquires an interest in the property before marriage, the property is considered separate property; if a person first acquires an ownership interest in the property during marriage, the property is considered to be community property.  Once the character of the property is established under the inception of title rule, that character will not change because of mutations in the property's form.  For example, if the property was sole or exchanged for other property. 

By way of example, the inception of title rule provides that the day the interest is earned in an bank account is the crucial date which decides whether the property was owned prior to marriage.  Therefore, if the interest in the bank account was earned prior to the date of marriage, then under the inception of title rule, the bank account interest earned (as of that date) would be considered separate property.  Another example might also be helpful.  Assume a car was purchased on the eve of marriage.  Under the inception of title rule, the car would be characterized as separate property because its title pre-dated the marriage. 

Where things can get a little tricky is what happens when the separate property goes through mutations during the marriage.  Here, we have to apply the concepts of tracing to the inception of title rule in order to determine the correct characterization of the property.  Although the concepts of tracing could encompass volumes of other posts, simply put tracing follows the changes of the original property to its current state.  So, if the bank account that was opened prior to marriage was closed out to purchase a car during the marriage, and the tracing concepts are satisfied, then the care would remain separate property under the inception of title rule and tracing concepts.

 

 

Prenup Bump -- Is Tiger Woods Changing Minds About Them?

Tiger Woods recent marital problem highlights the need for premarital agreements sometimes called prenuptial agreements.  There's been speculation that Tiger Woods and his wife may have reached an agreement to stay married and avoid divorce -- which in Texas is called a postnuptial agreement.  The gritty details of actor Dennis Hopper's and golf aces Tiger Woods' and Greg Norman's prenups have all been hot topics on the internet.

Suze Orman encourages every engaged couple to get one to protect their current and future assets as well as to sheild themselves in case a mate secretly runs up massive credit card debt. "People are hopeful," Orman says. "They want their relationship to last. ... It's just natural that they don't think they'll need a prenup. Never in a million years do they think (divorce) will happen." In 2008, the divorce rate was about 50%. Among married Americans, the median duration of their wedded life in 2008 was 18 years, according to Pew Research Center's analysis of government data. Given those odds, "Hope is not a financial plan," says Orman, who urges that every couple get a prenup. "The time to plan for a divorce is not when you're in a state of hate," she says.

Among the divorced, 15% say they regret not having a prenup in their most recent marriage, according to the Harris poll. Men are more likely than women to have this regret, at 19% vs. 12%. Nearly 40% of divorced Americans also say they would ask their significant other to sign a prenuptial agreement if they remarried.

Elizabeth Gilbert, the author of Eat Pray Love and Committed, advocates for couples to get prenups:  "Marriage is not just a private love story but also a social and economical contract of the strictest order," she says.  "If it weren't, there wouldn't be thousands of municipal, state and federal laws pertaining to our matrimonial union."

USA Today writer Laura Petrecca in the USA Today article Prenuptial agreements: Unromantic, but Important cites to a Harris Interactive study that nearly 2/3rds of singles say they would ask for a prenup.  On the other hand, of those polled, only 3% actually had prenups.

That statistic may mean that prenups are on the rise.  Or, it could mean that they chicken out of throwing cold water on the afterglow of the engagement. Let's face it: The afterglow of that Valentine's Day proposal often begins to dim as discussions of wedding details get started. The happy couples face potential buzz killers that are financial (how to keep reception costs down), logistical (where to seat relatives not on speaking terms) and, in recent years, even more controversial (So, honey, I love you, but how about that prenuptial agreement ...).

The prenup seems so utterly unromantic — or just plain wrong — but it's also become so right for so many these days: those keenly aware that a marriage may end up in a legal separation, divorce or death. Most prenups tackle financial issues such as real estate, division of bank accounts and potential spousal support in the case of divorce or separation.

Prenups can focus on the obvious disparity in earnings or wealth, credit card or student loan debts, future spousal support, or child support paid to children from another relationship.  But prenups can also address emotional or behavioral issues.  One example cited in the USA Today article references a husband who wanted to make sure his wife remained drug-free so he conditioned payment of spousal support upon a clean drug test each month.  Other prenups have addressed issues such as adultery, intimacy, weight-gain, division of household duties. Those clauses may seem unnecessary to some folks, but nailing down what is important to each individual — be it the ownership of a ski house, retaining the rights to an antique tea set or determining who keeps the pets after the breakup — is vital to do before the marriage laws kick in.

The bottom line is that a prenup can address whatever issues are important to the spouses -- from simple identification of assets and debts going into the marriage, to the more complex issues about how the marriage relationship will work.  There is really no "form" prenup -- it should contain the provisions that are important to the people signing it.  A prenup gives the soon-to-be-spouses a way to re-write the law that governs a divorce to conform to their own expectations.

Keep in mind, however, that even if  a prenup is executed, a party may still seek to challenge it.  Under Texas law a person may challenge a prenup based on the circumstances surrounding its signing -- was it signed under "duress"?  Or, it may be challenged based on the contents being so unfair as to be termed "unconscionable".  Parties to a prenup must make a full disclosure of income, assets, and debts.